Fórum Defesa Brasil

J.Ricardo escreveu: ↑Sex Jun 30, 2023 11:58 am Incrível como Brasil não consegue ultrapassar o México, mesmo eles estando em uma verdadeira narcoguerracivil.

cabeça de martelo escreveu: ↑Sex Jun 30, 2023 12:55 pm

J.Ricardo escreveu: ↑Sex Jun 30, 2023 11:58 am Incrível como Brasil não consegue ultrapassar o México, mesmo eles estando em uma verdadeira narcoguerracivil.

Apesar disso, há muitas fábricas na fronteira com os EUA que existem pura e simplesmente para abastecer o mercado interno do segundo país.

cabeça de martelo escreveu: ↑Sex Jun 30, 2023 12:55 pm

J.Ricardo escreveu: ↑Sex Jun 30, 2023 11:58 am Incrível como Brasil não consegue ultrapassar o México, mesmo eles estando em uma verdadeira narcoguerracivil.

Apesar disso, há muitas fábricas na fronteira com os EUA que existem pura e simplesmente para abastecer o mercado interno do segundo país.

Charap replies in kind to the various responses offered to his original piece. The central premise upon which he bases his rebuttal is straightforward: “My critics seem to see diplomacy as a synonym for surrender rather than as an important tool of statecraft.” This is correct, but understanding the argument behind why his critics view a peace settlement as capitulation is even more important. Russia (with Putin as anthropomorphized regression) has broken the rules-based order in a manner that undermines the end of history thesis. The implication of not rectifying this violation would be to implicitly acknowledge that the world is returning to balance of power geopolitics. This is a sin that cannot be forgiven. For that reason, nothing less than a total Russian collapse is an acceptable outcome to the war.

Suetham escreveu: ↑Sex Set 29, 2023 9:11 am



https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20 ... f-the-game
G77+China summit in Cuba calls on Global South to 'change the rules of the game'

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/ ... 023-09-19/
Canada, US worked closely on possible India link to Hardeep Singh Nijjar killing


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sideline ... 00067.html
On sidelines of UN General Assembly, Sri Lankan president calls Aukus 'a mistake' and rejects fears over China

https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2023/09 ... aduro-oil/
China deepens ties with Venezuela, challenging US ‘hegemonic mindset’



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... s-finances?
UN Nuclear Watchdog Risks Running Out of Money on US, China Standoff

https://thespectator.com/topic/world-ev ... na-russia/
World events are not going America’s way

cabeça de martelo escreveu: ↑Sex Jun 30, 2023 12:55 pm

J.Ricardo escreveu: ↑Sex Jun 30, 2023 11:58 am Incrível como Brasil não consegue ultrapassar o México, mesmo eles estando em uma verdadeira narcoguerracivil.

Apesar disso, há muitas fábricas na fronteira com os EUA que existem pura e simplesmente para abastecer o mercado interno do segundo país.

[...]

the new trade philosophy that the USMCA helped usher in focuses on protecting American workers and expanding the U.S. manufacturing sector.

[...]

The USMCA also added a novel provision requiring that 40 percent of car content (and 45 percent of truck content) be produced in high-wage factories—which effectively means factories in the United States and Canada. This “labor value content” rule was the first of its kind, and it is already helping to bring manufacturing back to the United States. The USMCA also requires that 70 percent of the steel and aluminum used in cars come from North America, and it mandates that certain core auto parts—such as engines and chassis—meet regional content valuation requirements. These changes took into account the trend towards electric vehicles. In practice, the USMCA rules on regional and labor value content essentially compel companies to locate the vast majority of their electric battery production in the United States.

The USMCA also includes the strongest and most comprehensive set of environmental obligations of any trade agreement, including commitments to limit vessel-source pollution, combat illegal fishing, and stop wildlife trafficking. Unlike NAFTA, the USMCA incorporates such obligations into the core of the agreement and makes them fully enforceable through a dispute-resolution process.

NAFTA was decades old, so it contained no obligations for the modern digital economy. The USMCA, on the other hand, contains a groundbreaking chapter on digital trade. It prohibits the application of custom duties to digital trade, it ensures that data can cross borders, it encourages the adoption of electronic authorization, and it assures cybersecurity collaboration. This chapter is the model for future trade negotiations.

USMCA directly addresses the practices of nonmarket countries, such as China. The deal expands the definition of “state-owned enterprises,” increases cooperation between countries in North America to fight foreign corruption, and requires additional coordination on tax evasion. And most importantly, the USMCA stipulates that if any of the three North American countries enters a free trade agreement with China, the others can withdraw from the USMCA.

The USMCA entered into force on July 1, 2020, barely three years ago. Many of its key provisions, such as the auto rules of origin, are not yet completely phased in, so it is early to fairly judge it. But in the words of one Brookings Institute report, “USMCA is off to a strong start bolstering prosperity across North America.”

Last year the total value of North American trade was $1.5 trillion. Both Mexico and Canada are now the United States’ top trading partners, surpassing China. The three countries of North America now account for a third of global GDP, and trade among them accounts for 9.5 million jobs.

The results on the investment front are just as impressive. The United States is now the largest destination for investment from Mexico and Canada and, according to Brookings, capital investment in the region grew 134 percent since the implementation of the USMCA and now stands at $219 billion. U.S. exports to Mexico and Canada are up 45 percent since 2020.

[...]

Perhaps more important, the past three years has seen a dramatic increase in factories being built in the United States. This year manufacturing investment is on track to surpass $180 billion, more than triple the annual average in the 2010s.

[...]

The combination of the Trump China tariffs and the USMCA has also led American companies and consumers to import far more goods from Mexico instead of China, reducing the United States’ dependence on a global adversary and contributing to the prosperity of an important next-door neighbor.