Marinha da República Popular da China (PLAN)

Assuntos em discussão: Marinha do Brasil e marinhas estrangeiras, forças de superfície e submarinas, aviação naval e tecnologia naval.

Moderador: Conselho de Moderação

Mensagem
Autor
Pepê Rezende
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 2790
Registrado em: Dom Dez 10, 2006 4:42 pm

#31 Mensagem por Pepê Rezende » Qua Abr 11, 2007 9:42 pm

hayes escreveu: Boa Noite sr. Rezende,


O BRIC, da forma como ele é descrito hoje, jamais existirá, e agora quem pede que o sr. escreva sou eu.

É evidente, contudo, que a tendência é de cada vez mais cooperação entre Brasil, China, Rússia e Índia, não necessáriamente todos ao mesmo tempo.

Mas imaginar um bloco coeso, homogêneo, e cooperando entre si e com todos, é realmente um exercício de futurologia bastante difícil.

Que existirá algum tipo de "BRIC"? Não tenho dúvidas! Mas que ele será totalmente diferente do que se imagina, é algo que tenho tanta certeza como de que o sol nascerá amanhã, novamente, e depois e depois.

EDITADO: Srs., porque a página ficou desformatada? A quebra de linha não ocorreu, contudo não há nenhuma imagem que pudesse justificar isto.


Nesse ponto concordamos. Mas ele está em curso e não há como detê-lo. São países com interesses comuns e que, com o BRIC, poderão reforçar sua atuação futura. Penso até em um BRIC ampliado, com o Paquistão e a África do Sul, num futuro mais longínquo.

Pepê




Avatar do usuário
P44
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 56025
Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
Localização: O raio que vos parta
Agradeceu: 2984 vezes
Agradeceram: 2677 vezes

#32 Mensagem por P44 » Ter Mai 29, 2007 10:59 am

Imagem
China is steadily increasing military spending and is developing some very sophisticated capabilities, says the Pentagon. Seen here is the Luhu-class destroyer Qingdao during a goodwill visit to Hawaii in Sept. 2006. (US Navy file photo)

Report Documents Chinese Military Power, Calls for Transparency


(Source: US Department of Defense; issued May 25, 2007)

WASHINGTON --- China must continue to make strides in military transparency as it moves forward to becoming a global power, Defense Department officials said here today.

The officials briefed Pentagon reporters on background following publication of the 2007 Military Power of the People’s Republic of China report. The annual report to Congress covers key developments in China over the past year and changes in Chinese military strategy.

President Bush characterized U.S.-Chinese relations as good following his most recent visit with Chinese President Hu Jintao in April. He said the United States and China can work together to further security and economic prosperity in Asia and around the world.

The annual report to Congress reflects the U.S. view that China is an emerging regional military and economic power with global aspirations.

“It paints a picture of a country that … has steadily devoted increasing resources to their military that is developing some very sophisticated capabilities,” Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said during a Pentagon news conference yesterday. Gates said the report is a realistic appraisal of Chinese security strategy.

Current relations with China have improved since the low point following the collision of a Chinese jet with a Navy EP-3 in 2001. Military-to-military ties are robust; there are troops visits and port calls. Military education exchange programs are being held at the senior and mid-level officer level. Joint military exercises are planned, and the two countries are working together on regional concerns – such as North Korean missile proliferation – and the danger bird flu presents. There are also discussions about disaster relief cooperation, officials said.

Gates wants China to have more transparency on military budgeting and strategy. The Chinese test of an anti-satellite capability in January caught the world by surprise and left many wondering what brought about that particular operation.

The official Chinese military budget is pegged at around $45 billion this year. But the real number could be as much as three times as high, officials said.

China’s defense budget is increasing by double-digit percentages per year, a rate that China has sustained for more than 15 years, fueled by the country’s remarkable economic growth, a defense official said. This year, the increase was 17.8 percent.

“We are convinced that China’s real defense spending is substantially higher – in the range of $85 billion to $125 billion in 2007,” the official continued.

This discrepancy between the official and actual figure is emblematic of U.S. concerns on transparency. Hiding these sums of money drives uncertainty over China’s intentions, the official said.

“It is not just a concern for the United States,” he said. “Many aspects of China’s military programs lead other nations to question China’s intentions and adjust their own behavior.”

Among the sums off the books are research and development expenditures, some military procurement, foreign purchases and dual-use technologies, officials said.

China is modernizing its forces. Officials said its newest missile -- the solid-fueled, transportable Df-31 -- could be used if needed. About 900 Chinese missiles are in place opposite Taiwan, compared with 710 to 790 missiles in late 2005.

China is developing home-grown advanced aviation and shipbuilding capabilities, and buying foreign – armaments, mostly from Russia. The report gives more information on Chinese moves toward building an aircraft carrier.

Overall, Gates said yesterday, the report is a balanced portrait of Chinese military capabilities.

“It paints a picture of a country that is devoting substantial resources to the military and developing, as I say, some very sophisticated capabilities,” he said. “We wish that there were greater transparency, that they would talk more about what their intentions are, what their strategies are. These are assessments that are in this publication. It would be nice to hear firsthand from the Chinese how they view some of these things.” (ends)



DoD Releases Annual China Military Power Report


(Source: US Department of Defense; issued May 25, 2007)



Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2000, the Department of Defense released to Congress today the “2007 Military Power of the People’s Republic of China” report.


- The entire PDF version (50 pages) of the report can be viewed at:
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/07 ... -final.pdf


A transcript of the Pentagon’s background briefing with Defense Department Officials at the Pentagon can be viewed at:
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/ ... iptid=3971

(ends)



Pentagon Says China Working to Project Power Farther


(Source: Voice of America news; issued May 25, 2007)



The U.S. Defense Department has issued its annual report on China's military capability, citing continuing efforts to project Chinese power beyond its immediate region and to develop high-technology systems that can challenge the best in the world. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates says some of China's efforts cause him concern.

The report says "China is pursuing long-term, comprehensive transformation of its military forces" to enable it to project power and deny other countries the ability to threaten it.

The report says China's short-term focus is on preventing Taiwan from becoming independent, and preventing the United States from helping Taiwan in any cross-straits confrontation.

But it says China is also developing weapons systems designed to protect its access to resources, particularly oil, and to compete in long-range, modern warfare with increasingly sophisticated missiles, aircraft and ships, including possibly aircraft carriers. The report says the modernization is based partly on purchases, especially from Russia, but also on increasingly capable domestic military industries.

It says China is also developing the capability to compete in outer space and systems that could attack other nations' computer networks and communications capabilities. China was widely condemned for using an anti-satellite weapon to destroy one of its own satellites in January.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates would not say which of China' military moves cause him concern, but at a news conference on Thursday he indicated he is worried about China's continuing refusal to provide detailed information about its defense capabilities. The report says secrecy is part of China's basic defense strategy.

"We wish that there were greater transparency, that they would talk more about what their intentions are, what their strategies are," said Gates. "These are assessments that are in this publication. It would be nice to hear first hand from the Chinese how they view some of these things."

In the past, China has criticized these annual Pentagon reports, which are required by congress. But Secretary Gates says the report does not exaggerate or attempt to paint China's growing capabilities as a threat.

"I think it's a realistic appraisal of the Chinese view of their own security needs and what their strategies are," said the defense secretary. "It paints a picture of a country that has steadily devoted increasing resources to their military, that is developing some very sophisticated capabilities."

One area of ambiguity involves China's defense budget, which is officially $45 billion this year, a nearly 18 percent increase over last year. The Pentagon report says China's real defense spending is likely double or triple that figure.

The report also says China's longstanding pledge not to be the first to use nuclear weapons is becoming 'ambiguous,' as Chinese experts debate how to use their growing missile capabilities.

But the top U.S. military officer, General Peter Pace, who visited China in March, says China's current intentions are not the most important thing for him. He says the U.S. military needs to plan based on China's growing capabilities, which could be put to a variety of uses in the future.

"The most important thing from my perspective is for the United States military to stay well out ahead of any potential adversary, so that we are properly prepared should somebody's intent change to deal with that threat when it arises," he said.

The Pentagon report on China's military capability also notes that Chinese leaders have cooperated with the United States on a variety of issues, including North Korea's nuclear arsenal, and that China has a growing interest in global stability as it pursues economic development.

But the report also says China has demonstrated an increased willingness to work with rogue states and countries with poor human rights records, if those countries can help China reach its goals. It also says China has sold military technology to some countries in order to secure deals on fuel purchases.

The report calls China's efforts to modernize its forces and military doctrines "impressive," and it says there is an emphasis on what China calls "active defense," which the report's authors say means developing a preemptive strike capability, and using it if Chinese leaders feel it is necessary. The report says the concept also involves increasing China's ability to use military coercion, without actually using force.

At the same time, the report also expresses concern about potential miscalculation by Chinese leaders of their own military strength that could lead to unnecessary conflicts.

And the authors are also concerned that Chinese leaders could respond to internal dissent by launching a foreign military adventure in order to appeal to feelings nationalism and restore domestic stability. It says China's Communist Party leaders have "a deep rooted fear of losing political power" that shapes their strategic outlook and drives many of their decisions. (ends)



China: Perceived Arms Buildup Troubles Washington


(Source: Radio Free Europe; issued May 28, 2007)



A new annual report on China's arms development, issued by the U.S. Defense Department, says China is progressing with the development of long-range weapons that include guided missiles and new nuclear submarines.

The Pentagon's report suggests the nature of China's armed forces is changing rapidly away from local self-defense toward strategic capabilities.

Beijing rejects criticism that the modernization is aimed at increasing China's weight across the region, and says the impressive array of weaponry is purely for defensive purposes.

China's official press has called the Pentagon report an attempt to mislead international opinion with falsehoods that is damaging to Sino-U.S. military relations.

The report points to the development of new long-range missiles capable of carrying a nuclear warhead to the United States, plus the ability to deploy those missiles on mobile launchers.

It also sees Chinese work on nuclear submarines capable of firing atom-tipped missiles from underwater, as well as modern aircraft. The submarines would have the ability to sail close to targets anywhere in the world to deliver a surprise attack. Each one of the 8,000-ton Russian-designed Jin-class vessels would be able to carry up to 16 missiles. A fleet of five is planned, which would make China the world's third most powerful country in this category of weapons, behind the United States and Russia.

Development Questions

However, senior analyst Shannon Kile of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute says the submarine program seems to be running into development difficulties.

"This is a project which had a long and troubled development history," Kile says. "It's unclear how close the Chinese are to making this force operational. There have been reports in the last few years that they are fairly close, but there is other evidence to suggest that they are still some years away [from deployment]."

Another senior analyst, Jean-Philippe Beja of the Center for International Studies and Research in Paris, says Taiwan still appears to be the focus of China's defense efforts. This preoccupation has shaped Chinese thinking on defense for decades, and has not required strategic force projection.

"The Chinese army is still in the process of modernizing," Beja says. "It is very backward in comparison to say, the U.S. armed forces. So what the Chinese are saying is that they are only trying to keep up with the latest developments, that they have not changed their strategy, and, that being the case, they have no capability to project strength very far away."

'Still Unclear'

Analyst Kile says it is too early to say whether the acquisition of the new arms is a modernization of China's military forces, or actually an expansion of those forces.

"What seems to be happening is that China is moving toward a more modern, survivable force -- that is to say, mobile land-based missiles and sea-launched missiles," Kile says. "It's completely unclear whether that means the force will be approximately the same size as at present, or will be considerably expanded over the next decade or so."

Not only is China aiming for big strides in military hardware, it has also moved forward rapidly on military-related space technology. Its spectacular interception of an orbiting satellite with a killer missile in January has worried the U.S. defense establishment.

The theme of the militarization of space has been taboo for decades. But China's unexpected experiment helps bring the subject to life again.

-ends-




*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
Avatar do usuário
talharim
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9831
Registrado em: Sex Mai 07, 2004 11:40 pm
Localização: Santos-SP
Agradeceram: 212 vezes

#33 Mensagem por talharim » Dom Jun 03, 2007 6:44 pm

Imagem




"I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French

one behind me."

General George S. Patton.
Avatar do usuário
Dieneces
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 6524
Registrado em: Seg Abr 09, 2007 1:50 pm
Localização: São Gabriel , RS
Agradeceu: 9 vezes
Agradeceram: 10 vezes

#34 Mensagem por Dieneces » Seg Jun 04, 2007 12:16 am

talharim escreveu:Imagem
O do meio é o mais chinês deles. :twisted: :D




Brotei no Ventre da Pampa,que é Pátria na minha Terra/Sou resumo de uma Guerra,que ainda tem importância/Sou Raiz,sou Sangue,sou Verso/Sou maior que a História Grega/Eu sou Gaúcho e me chega,p'ra ser Feliz no Universo.
Avatar do usuário
Morcego
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9018
Registrado em: Sáb Mai 01, 2004 12:27 pm
Localização: Santos/SP
Agradeceu: 1 vez
Agradeceram: 9 vezes
Contato:

#35 Mensagem por Morcego » Seg Jun 04, 2007 6:59 pm

o BRIC´S esta se tornando cada vez mais RIC´S.




Avatar do usuário
Einsamkeit
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9040
Registrado em: Seg Mai 02, 2005 10:02 pm
Localização: Eu sou do Sul, é so olhar pra ver que eu sou do Sul, A minha terra tem um cel azul, é so olhar e ver

#36 Mensagem por Einsamkeit » Ter Jun 05, 2007 12:11 am

Muito boa Dieneces

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:




Somos memórias de lobos que rasgam a pele
Lobos que foram homens e o tornarão a ser
ou talvez memórias de homens.
que insistem em não rasgar a pele
Homens que procuram ser lobos
mas que jamais o tornarão a ser...
Moonspell - Full Moon Madness

Imagem
Avatar do usuário
P44
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 56025
Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
Localização: O raio que vos parta
Agradeceu: 2984 vezes
Agradeceram: 2677 vezes

#37 Mensagem por P44 » Sex Jul 06, 2007 11:24 am

China’s New Missile Submarine Seen By Satellite

By REUTERS

China’s newest ballistic missile submarine, the Jin-class vessel, has been spotted for the first time by a commercial satellite, a nuclear expert at the Federation of American Scientists said July 5.

The submarine was photographed in late 2006 south of the northeastern Chinese city of Dalian, said Hans Kristensen, director of the FAS’s Nuclear Information Project.

It appeared to be based on Russia’s Victor-3 model and, although photographs are unclear, resembles China’s early-1980s Xia-class submarines, said Kristensen, who spotted the long-anticipated vessel
.
The 436-foot Jin-class submarine probably will carry Julang-2 sea-launched ballistic missiles in its estimated 12 launch tubes. It was spotted moored at Xiaopingdao Submarine Base, which it has used for testing in the past, he said.

“Chinese nuclear submarines are normally not based there. They’re located to the south, near Qingdao,” Kristensen said by telephone.

In a defense strategy paper published July 5, Australia echoed previous documents by the U.S. and Japan in voicing concern about a rapid Chinese military expansion and lack of transparency about strategy and policy.
The U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence estimated in December that China might build five Jin-class submarines, but that estimate was not included in the Pentagon’s annual report on China’s military power, published in May, Kristensen noted.
“The Chinese naval nuclear programs so far have been very, very slow,” he said. “They’ve managed to get this submarine out, but it’s been under construction for many years.”
Images of the submarine are published and analyzed on the FAS Web site and visible on Google Earth.
Normally secretive China likely sees a deterrent effect in allowing the submarine to be seen from the sky by outsiders, Kristensen said.

“The fact that they have it and the fact that it moves around, I’m sure they want the world to know about it,” he said.


http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F= ... &C=asiapac

Imagem
(Xia Class- Type 094)




*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
Avatar do usuário
Bolovo
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 28558
Registrado em: Ter Jul 12, 2005 11:31 pm
Agradeceu: 547 vezes
Agradeceram: 442 vezes

#38 Mensagem por Bolovo » Qui Jul 12, 2007 9:49 pm

PLAN 054A Frigate enters sea trials

Imagem
Imagem
Imagem


Simplesmente linda! :shock:




"Eu detestaria estar no lugar de quem me venceu."
Darcy Ribeiro (1922 - 1997)
Avatar do usuário
P44
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 56025
Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
Localização: O raio que vos parta
Agradeceu: 2984 vezes
Agradeceram: 2677 vezes

#39 Mensagem por P44 » Sex Jul 13, 2007 5:51 am

AH GANDA CHINA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:




*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
Avatar do usuário
Moccelin
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4848
Registrado em: Qua Abr 11, 2007 11:53 am
Localização: Três Corações - MG
Agradeceram: 2 vezes

#40 Mensagem por Moccelin » Sex Jul 13, 2007 8:23 am

Srs., porque a página ficou desformatada? A quebra de linha não ocorreu, contudo não há nenhuma imagem que pudesse justificar isto.


É aquela URL gigante lá em cima...




The cake is a lie...
Avatar do usuário
P44
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 56025
Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
Localização: O raio que vos parta
Agradeceu: 2984 vezes
Agradeceram: 2677 vezes

#41 Mensagem por P44 » Sex Jul 13, 2007 8:40 am

PLA Navy Carrier Update and Euro-Naval Notes


by Richard Fisher, Jr.
Published on November 7th, 2006
ARMS SHOW REPORTS


Yes, China is dead serious about aircraft carriers.

The most important news to emerge from the Euronaval weapons show at Le Bourget field near Paris, October 23-27, was word that Russia had agreed to sell China two Sukhoi Su-33 carrier-based fighters, with the possibility of selling up to 48 or 50 of these fighters. These would arm the three carrier battle groups that, according to Chinese press reports, are on track to be ready in a little more than a decade.

Should these fighters receive a maximum Russian upgrade, then the PLA Navy could possess fighters that in important respects would be superior the U.S. Navy F/A-18E/F, the dominant U.S. Navy combat aircraft for the foreseeable future.

In addition, China would have more carriers available for operations within a thousand miles of her shores than would the U.S. plus her allies. Carriers, with their ability to create local air superiority and sea denial, may be particularly effective in attacks on island territories belonging to such states as Korea (Socotra island) or Japan (the Senkakus) or the Philippines (who already have a Chinese presence on Mischief Reef) or Indonesia (the Natuna group) or even Taiwan --Taiping island, the most important strategic position in the South China Sea.

The best response will be submarines, which Japan has in limited numbers and Korea is building, but which are otherwise not widely possessed by American allies, as well as advanced anti-ship missiles and air power of a sort that, absent some improvements, will be no match for the Sukhois.

But the Sukhois may represent the limit of what Russia can do; they have a 5th generation fighter program but with uncertain prospects for success. Moscow lacks the most advanced technologies, the sorts that have the greatest potential to destabilize the region, such as stealth. So Beijing is now looking to Europe for that next input of know-how.

Euronaval heard new calls by the French government on October 25, 2006 to lift the 1989 European Union (EU) arms embargo on China. New European naval platform and weapons technologies revealed at Euronaval ensure that once the EU embargo is lifted, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will seek to move quickly to gain access and cement industrial relationships. China clearly is looking to the EU to provide "next-generation" military technologies increasingly unavailable from Russia’s weapons combine, which is still struggling to recover from the demise of their well-funded Soviet customer

Sukhoi Su-33 Sale To PLA

Russian press reports about the sale of Suhkoi Su-33 naval fighters to China offer further confirmation of China’s ambition to develop carrier aviation. At the 2005 Moscow Airshow Russian sources had initially disclosed that China was interested in the Su-33, a much-modified carrier compatible version of the basic Su-27 heavy fighter.[1] At Moscow the Russian also demonstrated the larger twin-seat Su-33UB training and attack fighter for a PLA delegation. But in late October 2006 Russian reports in Kommersant and elsewhere revealed that China has made an initial purchase of two Su-33 fighters for evaluation, likely to be followed by an order for 12, and the possibility of additional sales that could lead to a total of 48 to 50 of these fighters, for about $2.5 billion.[2] If acquired, such numbers might outfit two regiments of the PLA Naval Air Force.

Imagem
Sukhoi Su-33 Naval Fighter: On display at the 2005 Moscow Airshow, China may buy 2 and then up to 50 of these fighters to equip PLA Naval Air Force regiments to operate from new aircraft carriers. Credit: RD Fisher


A regiment of 24 to 25 would also be enough to outfit a Russian style carrier like the Varyag, which is now undergoing refurbishment in Dalian harbor. In Moscow one Russian source noted that purchased fighters would not equip the Varyag, but a carrier to be built in the future, so the purchase of two regiments might be an indication that China intends to build two more carriers about the same size as the Varyag. However, such can only be speculation; Russia is now developing a new class of aircraft carrier that it hopes to launch later in the next decade. While little is known about their new carrier design, concepts from the mid-1990s suggest Russian consideration of a much larger hull incorporating catapults for the first time, which would also support heavier aircraft like naval AWACS. As the PLA is also known to be developing at least one carrier AWACS aircraft design, it stands to reason that it would also be very interested in Russia’s new carrier design.


Imagem
Imagem
Russian Carrier Designs: China is consulting with Russia regarding future carrier designs, though these are previous designs from the 1980s and 1990s that could be guiding China-Russia consultations. Credit: Russian Internet


As for the Varyag itself, some in the U.S. Intelligence Community and others view it as a possible "transitional" ship to develop PLA carrier aviation, but with potential military applications as well.[3] The purchase of 2 to 12 Su-33s to start would be consistent with the more limited goal of assessing the aircraft and obtaining initial experience with carrier aircraft operations. Also, a Varyag with 12 Su-33s, a small number of Su-33UBs and supporting helicopters, would pose a formidable political symbol of Chinese strategic ascendance to Asian allies of the United States already wary of its declining influence vis-à-vis China. A Varyag so equipped would also allow the PLA to more quickly develop difficult combined-arms operations between PLA Navy, Air Force, Second Artillery and space forces to better combat U.S. aircraft carrier groups.

Imagem
Sukhoi Su-30UB: Demonstrated to PLA visitors to the 2005 Moscow Airshow, this unique Russian fighter could be developed into an electronic warfare version capable of electronic attack, information attack and jamming missions. Credit: RD Fisher


But the purchase of just a small number of Su-33s may convey other intentions when considering another Russian revelation from the Russian press that China had managed to acquire from the Ukraine one of the T-10K prototypes for the Su-33.[4] This may indicate that while purchasing some Su-33s, the PLA’s real intention is to obtain the ability to produce their own version of the Su-33, to be based on the Su-27/J-11 now under co-production at the Shenyang Aircraft Company. Shenyang and KnAAPO, the maker of the PLA’s Su-27 and Su-30 fighters, have been at loggerheads since 2004 over the Shenyang’s desire to build a much-modified J-11 that would vastly reduce Russian content and potentially allow China to market their own version of yet another Russian fighter. KnAAPO and its parent company Sukhoi would like maximize their profits from future upgrade or modifications Shenyang may make to its J-11s. KnAAPO has also produced all of the Russian Navy’s Su-33s and would likely want to retain this business.

At Moscow in 2005 a Russian source was rather confident that China could not master all of the necessary modifications to turn their J-11s into carrier capable fighters like the Su-33. Compared to the basic Su-27, the Su-33 has a strengthened airframe covered with corrosion-resistant materials, much strengthened landing gear, the addition of "canard" lift devices and larger wing flaps to lower landing speed, folding wings, an aerial refueling probe, and a landing system that automatically controls the aircraft to land on the carrier deck.[5] The Su-33UB contains further aerodynamic refinements, uses more stealthy composite materials, and can carry a larger radar for attack missions. The Su-33UB has also been proposed for AWACS missions with the addition of a phased arrary radar atop the dorsal spine or under the fuselage. The Su-33UB demonstrated for the PLA in 2005 had also been modified with thrust-vectoring engines which greatly improve maneuverability.

But a year later it is possible to conclude that perhaps as far back as the late 1990s the PLA has been trying to develop an indigenous carrier capable J-11. Such a fighter may also benefit from Shenyang’s indigenized land-based J-11 program, which will likely incorporate new 13,200 to 13,600kg thrust WS-10A "Taishan" turbofan engines, new advanced PLA-developed radar and PLA-developed PL-12 advanced air-to-air missiles and new precision-guided ground attack weapons. A navalized J-11 based on this program would be decidedly superior to the Su-33 now in service with the Russian Navy.

Imagem
Shenyang’s J-11 Ambitions: It is possible that for a number of years that Shenyang has been developing a carrier capable version of it J-11, benefiting from its program to create a new multi-role version of the J-11. Credit: Chinese Internet


To head off this program, and to appeal for future Russian Navy orders, Sukhoi is promoting upgrades for the Su-33. These will likely benefit from an upgraded version of the Su-35 that was marketed at the recent 2006 Zhuhai Airshow.[6] One major upgrade will be replacing the 12,500kg thrust AL-31F engines with 13,500kg thrust AL-31-F-M1 engines, which will allow for more rapid take-offs and larger weapons carriage. And while funding constraints have prevented radar and weapon upgrades, it is now possible to envision new Su-33s being equipped with new active electronic scanning array (AESA) radar like the Phazotron Zhuk-MFSE revealed in 2005. This radar can simultaneously track 30 aerial targets, two ground targets simultaneously, and locate naval targets out to 300km. Russian radar maker NIIP is also working on AESA radar. With additional development such phased array radar can themselves become weapons for delivering a range of electromagnetic attacks into enemy electronics. The Su-33UB’s ability to carry a much larger active array makes more attractive for such electronic weapons. The Su-33 can also be expected to carry the full range of Russian weapons, such as the Vympel R-77 active-guided BVR AAM, the 300km range Novator KS-172, the Kh-31 supersonic anti-radar/anti-ship, the Raduga 300km Kh-59MK anti-ship missile, and soon, air launched version of the unique 200km range Novator 3M-54E anti-ship missile and the 300km range 3M-14E land-attack cruise missile.

Imagem
Phazotron AESA Radar: Revealed at the 2005 Moscow Airshow, the Phazotron Zhuk MFE is now undergoing testing. Credit: RD Fisher


Should China instead opt to fund a maximum Russian upgrade for the Su-33 instead of developing their own version, the PLA Navy could begin limited carrier operations by the middle of the next decade with a fighter competitive to, if not superior in some respects, to the U.S. Navy Boeing F/A-18E/F fighter bomber. In terms of range and maneuverability, it appears that the larger Su-33 with lower wing loading and higher thrust engines, will dominate the F/A-18E/F.[7] This advantage will multiply should the new Su-33 use thrust-vectoring engines. Such platform advantages may be regarded as obsolete considering the U.S. use of long-range off-board sensors like AWACS, UAVs and even satellites, plus the ability of new Helmet Mounted Displays for reducing the advantages of platform maneuverability. However, the Russian and Chinese investment in counter AWACS and anti-satellite systems could revive requirements for platform superiority, especially when both sides have Helmet Display systems.


Imagem
Imagem
Boeing F/A-18E/F and the Raytheon AN/APG-79 ASEA radar: The U.S. Navy is betting this combination will sustain the superiority of its carrier combat fighters, but an upgraded Su-33 could radically alter this projection. Credit: RD Fisher


In terms of electronic systems, the U.S. Navy is leading by fitting current and future F/A-18E/Fs with the Raytheon AN/APG-79 active electronic array radar (AESA), but Russian AESA radar may soon be available for the Su-33. Regarding weapons there may be rough parity, with the Su-33 having access to more and longer-range anti-ship missiles than the F/A-18E/F. While it is due to be supplemented by the stealthy attack mission oriented Lockheed-Martin F-35C in the next decade, the F/A-18E/F will remain the numerically dominant U.S. Navy combat aircraft for the foreseeable future. Although the U.S. would retain a commendable advantage accrued from generations of professional carrier operations and development, it would be an unwelcome development for PLA to begin its carrier aviation era with a combat aircraft competitive to superior to the F/A-18E/F.

Imagem


Severnoye and the Type 054 Frigate

Russian sources noted that in contrast to other firms, the Severnoye ship design and construction company played a consulting role in the development of the PLAN Type 054A JIANKAI frigate. These sources noted Severnoye’s role was confined to assisting the integration of Russian systems on to the ship. These sources noted that the Type 054’s design was largely a product of indigenous Chinese design bureau. However, the Type 054A also uses a full suite of Russian weapon systems, including the Shtil-1 vertical launched SAM, the MINERAL-E passive radar and data link system, and the FREGAT long-range search radar. The helicopter hanger is large enough to support a Kamov Ka-28 size helicopter. Two Type 054A frigates were under construction as of late 2006.

Imagem
Type 054A Frigate Under Construction: Now beginning series production, the Type 054A provides the PLA Navy with a less expensive stealthy ship armed with capable Russian anti-air weapons and surveillance systems. Credit: Chinese Internet

Possible Almaz ZUBR Hovercraft Sale to China

In July 2006 Russian press reports quoted sources from the Almaz ship design bureau that it was close to completing a sale to China of six of its unique 550 ton ZUBR heavy amphibious assault hovercraft, with discussions also exploring possible co-production in China. At Euronaval Russian sources noted that China had not yet signed such a contract, but negotiations were still underway. These sources also noted that it took a little over two years to build a ZUBR assuming full funding. For a large order of the hovercraft, it was noted that Almaz would likely distribute construction among multiple shipyards. The ZUBR can carry up to four heavy main battle tanks or up to 20 lighter wheeled APC class vehicles. Being a hovercraft, the ZUBR can also much more easily penetrate Taiwan’s difficult west coast, giving the PLA many more options for amphibious attack routes. China itself has invested in the development of large hovercraft, but not as large as the ZUBR. Co-production of the ZUBR would likely enable China to more rapidly prefect very large hovercraft.

Imagem
Almaz ZUBR hovercraft: The sale of even a small number of ZUBR to the PLA would greatly increase PLA Army invasion options for Taiwan. Credit: RD Fisher

Air Launched CLUBS

The Novator company, designer and manufacturer of the unique CLUB family of ship and submarine launched anti-ship, land-attack and anti-submarine cruise missiles, stated that at the 2007 Moscow Airshow they would display new air-launched version of their 3M anti-ship missile and their 3M56E land attack cruise missiles. The unique two-stage 220km range 9M launches as a subsonic missile until a terminal supersonic second stage detaches about 50km from the target, to more effectively counter ship-based defensive systems. The 300km range 3M56E was revealed in late 2004. Novator officials stated these missiles would be displayed on a Sukhoi Su-30 fighter-bomber. India and China both deploy the CLUB family of missile from their KILO submarines and India from its Project frigates. As both also employ versions of the Su-30, it is logical that Novator hopes they would both also purchase the air launched versions.

Imagem
Future Air Launched Clubs: Novator is now adding air-launched version of its 3M65E anti-ship and an 3M-14E land attack cruise missiles to its export offerings. Credit: RD Fisher


RIF-Ms to China Downgraded

Russian sources at Euronaval claimed that Altair’s RIF-M naval SAMs employed on China’s two new Type 051C destroyers are not capable of anti-missile missions. They would require both software and hardware upgrades in order to perform that mission. However, these sources did indicate that discussions are underway with China regarding the sale of more capable versions of the RIF-M. These sources also noted that China has not been sold the latest modifications of the RIF-M with employ the latest 45km range 9M96E and the 150km range 9M96E1 SAMs. Both of these, in addition to a version that would incorporate the naval version of the S-300PMU-2 FAVORIT, are anti-missile capable These two missiles can be carried four to a launch tube that would carry but one 150km range 48 SAM. The Type 051C carries 48 launch tubes for its RIF-M system.

Imagem
Imagem
RIF-M on Type 051C DDG: Russian sources claim the currently deployed system is not capable of missile interception, but perhaps future versions sold to China may be so capable. Credit: RD Fisher, Chinese Internet


Potential European-Chinese Cooperation

Despite France’s enthusiasm for lifting the 1989 arms embargo, strong U.S. opposition in 2005, plus Washington’s efforts to explain to defense industries how military technical cooperation with China will impact their business with the U.S. has produced results: at least British companies who look for greater business in the U.S. are not eager to do defense business with China.[8] However, barring a near term act of Chinese aggression, it is not assured that the embargo will persist for many more years. French and German marine diesel engines power PLA warships and submarines. Eurocopter is enabling China to develop and produce modern helicopters, and a recent decision by Airbus to build an assembly line for its A321 airliners in Tianjian will also assist China’s efforts to efficiently build future large civil and military transport aircraft. In terms of naval technology, the PLA would look to Europe to sell or co-develop technologies that Russia is not yet able to offer: advanced phased array radar; unmanned underwater combat systems; new more efficient air independent propulsion systems for submarines; and modern stealthy combat ship designs. In time, France could offer modern aircraft carrier technologies and advanced nuclear submarine technologies.


Imagem
Imagem
Future European Opportunities: The PLA already co-produces French SEMT Pielstick diesel engines for frigates and support ships, and would likely be interested in many advanced European naval technologies like the MESMA air independent propulsion system. Credit: RD Fisher




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] See author, "2005: A Turning Point for China’s Aircraft Carrier Ambitions," International Assessment and Strategy Center, January 8, 2006.

[2] Konstantin Lantratov and Alexandra Gritskova, "China lands on Russian carrier," Kommersant, October 23, 2005; "China Buying Russian Fighter Jets," Prensa Latina, October 24, 2006, http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID ... 7A632CE%7D)&language=EN; also see Siva Govindasamy, "Beijing lines up naval fighter deal," Flight International, October 31-November 6, 2006, p. 16.

[3] Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress, Military Power of the People’s Republic of China, May 23, 2006, p. 32.

[4] "China Buying…," op-cit.

[5] For more detail on the history of the Su-33’s development see, Andrei Fomin, Su-27, Flanker Story, Moscow: RA Intervestnk, 2000, pp. 111-162 and Yefim Gordon and Peter Davidson, Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker, Warbird Tech Series Volume 42, North Branch NM: Speciality Press, 2006, pp. 53-64.

[6] "Sukhoi markets new multi-role fighter at Chinese airshow," RIA Novosti, October 31, 2006.

[7] For more data on the design, performance and upgrade potential of the Su-33 see Dr. Carlo Kopp, "The Flanker Fleet-The PLA's 'Big Stick'," International Assessment and Strategy Center, May 3, 2006.

[8] This sentiment was expressed to the author by British aviation industry representatives at a conference in London on October 28, 2006.




*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
Quiron
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 1375
Registrado em: Sáb Abr 01, 2006 9:41 pm
Localização: Brasília-DF.
Agradeceu: 28 vezes
Agradeceram: 76 vezes

#42 Mensagem por Quiron » Ter Jul 31, 2007 3:07 pm

Chinese Navy To Build Two Carriers With Russian Help

by Staff Writers
Hong Kong (RIA Novosti) Jul 31, 2007
Kanwa, a Hong Kong defense news agency, said Friday purchases by China of Russian aircraft carrier components suggested that Beijing was planning to build one or two aircraft carriers, possibly by 2015. The agency cited a senior source in the Russian Navy, saying that Russia and China have an agreement to purchase four deck landing systems capable of handling heavy deck-based fighters such as the Su-33 Flanker.
Kanwa experts suggested that one landing system would be studied and copied, and another would be installed on the Varyag, a Soviet-made carrier, which was bought incomplete from Ukraine for $20 million in 1998 by a Macao tourist agency.

The agency, Diversoes Chong Lot Limitada, promised to convert the ship into a large "riverboat casino," but disappeared shortly after the Varyag was towed to the Chinese port of Dalian. Regional media have repeatedly suggested China would use the Varyag as a template for its own carriers.

Two other deck landing systems, Kanwa expert Andrei Chang said, will be installed on two new carriers China unconvincingly denies it is going to build. He said the recent purchase of a T10K, an earlier version of the Su-33, from Ukraine, demonstrates that China also plans to build its own deck-based long-range fighter.

Official confirmation of the carrier project was likely to be made after the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing.

"Until then we will probably not hear anything official on this issue; moreover, Chinese docks are unable to handle such large projects at the moment," he said.

The project, he said, could be announced in 2009-2012 and completed in 2013-2017.

Last year, Alexander Denisov, who runs Russia's agency for military-technical cooperation and headed the Russian delegation at the Air Show China 2006 in Zhuhai, said Russia could help China with building an aircraft carrier if they asked for assistance. This March, a senior Chinese official conceded that Beijing was studying the possibility.

http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Chinese ... p_999.html




luis F. Silva
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 2470
Registrado em: Qui Mar 23, 2006 12:01 am
Localização: portugal:
Agradeceram: 9 vezes

#43 Mensagem por luis F. Silva » Sex Set 07, 2007 5:23 am





cumprimentos.

Luis Filipe Silva

-------------------
CAMPANHA ANTI-FLOOD: OU POSTA KÔZA QUE PRESTE, QUE VÁ SOMAR, OU FICA SÓ LENDO. CHAT É NO MSN & QUETALES!!! by Túlio
Avatar do usuário
P44
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 56025
Registrado em: Ter Dez 07, 2004 6:34 am
Localização: O raio que vos parta
Agradeceu: 2984 vezes
Agradeceram: 2677 vezes

#44 Mensagem por P44 » Sex Set 07, 2007 6:01 am

que pena não virem a Lisboa :cry:




*Turn on the news and eat their lies*
Avatar do usuário
Pablo Maica
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9112
Registrado em: Seg Dez 01, 2003 4:55 pm
Localização: Santa Maria Rio Grande Do Sul
Agradeceu: 340 vezes
Agradeceram: 644 vezes

#45 Mensagem por Pablo Maica » Ter Set 11, 2007 12:29 am

LPD chinês começando as provas de mar:
Imagem
Imagem
Imagem
Imagem
Imagem
Imagem
Imagem
Imagem

Um abraço e t+ :D




Responder