Desert Storm - 15 anos

Área destinada para discussão sobre os conflitos do passado, do presente, futuro e missões de paz

Moderador: Conselho de Moderação

Mensagem
Autor
Avatar do usuário
VICTOR
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4238
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 5:50 pm
Localização: Curitiba

Desert Storm - 15 anos

#1 Mensagem por VICTOR » Ter Jan 17, 2006 12:56 pm

Em 17 de janeiro de 1991, iniciava-se a campanha aérea.

Imagem

Air campaign

A day after the deadline set in Resolution 678, the coalition launched a massive air campaign codenamed Operation Desert Storm with more than 1,000 sorties launching per day, beginning early morning on January 17, 1991. Five hours after the first attacks, Baghdad state radio broadcast a voice identified as Saddam Hussein declaring that "The great duel, the mother of all battles has begun. The dawn of victory nears as this great showdown begins."

Weapons used in the air campaign included smart bombs, cluster bombs, daisy cutters and cruise missiles. Iraq responded by launching 8 Scud missiles into Israel the next day. The first priority for coalition forces was destruction of the Iraqi air force and anti-aircraft facilities. This was quickly achieved and for the duration of the war Coalition aircraft could operate largely unchallenged. Despite Iraq's better-than-expected anti-aircraft capabilities, only one coalition aircraft was lost in the opening day of the war. Stealth aircraft were heavily used in this phase to elude Iraq's extensive SAM systems and anti-aircraft weapons; once these were destroyed, other types of aircraft could more safely be used. The sorties were launched mostly from Saudi Arabia and the six coalition aircraft carrier groups in the Persian Gulf.

The next coalition targets were command and communication facilities. Saddam had closely micromanaged the Iraqi forces in the Iran-Iraq War and initiative at the lower levels was discouraged. Coalition planners hoped Iraqi resistance would quickly collapse if deprived of command and control. The first week of the air war saw a few Iraqi sorties but these did little damage, and thirty-eight Iraqi MiGs were shot down by Coalition planes. Soon after, the Iraqi airforce began fleeing to Iran, with between 115 to 140 aircraft flown to Iran [12]. On January 23, Iraq began dumping approximately 1 million tons of crude oil into the gulf, causing the largest oil spill in history.

The third and largest phase of the air campaign targeted military targets throughout Iraq and Kuwait: Scud missile launchers, weapons of mass destruction sites, weapons research facilities and naval forces. About one third of the Coalition airpower was devoted to attacking Scuds, which were on trucks and therefore difficult to locate. In addition, it targeted facilities useful for both the military and civilians: electricity production facilities, nuclear reactors, telecommunications equipment, port facilities, oil refineries and distribution, railroads and bridges. Electrical power facilities were destroyed across the country. At the end of the war, electricity production was at four percent of its pre-war levels. Bombs destroyed the utility of all major dams, most major pumping stations and many sewage treatment plants.


In most cases, the Allies avoided hitting civilian-only facilities. However, on February 13, 1991, two laser-guided "smart bombs" destroyed the Amiriyah blockhouse, which the Iraqis claimed was for the auspices of an air shelter. U.S. officials claimed that the blockhouse was a military communications center, but Western reporters have been unable to find evidence for this. The White House claims, in a report titled Apparatus of Lies: Crafting Tragedy, that U.S. intelligence sources reported the blockhouse was being used for military command purposes. [13] In his book, Saddam's Bombmaker, the former director of Iraq's nuclear weapon program, who defected to the west, supports the theory that the facility was used for both purposes.

We sought refuge several times at the shelter.... But it was always filled.... The shelter had television sets, drinking fountains, its own electrical generator, and looked sturdy enough to withstand a hit from conventional weapons. But I stopped trying to get in one night after noticing some long black limousines slithering in and out of an underground gate in the back. I asked around and was told that it was a command center. After considering it more closely, I decided it was probably Saddam's own operational base.

Iraq launched missile attacks on coalition bases in Saudi Arabia and on Israel, in the hopes of drawing Israel into the war and drawing other Arab states out of it. This strategy proved ineffective. Israel did not join the coalition, and all Arab states stayed in the coalition except Jordan, which remained officially neutral throughout. The Scud missiles generally caused fairly light damage, although its potency was felt on February 25 when 28 Americans were killed when a Scud destroyed their barracks in Dhahran. The Scuds targeting Israel were ineffective due to the fact that increasing the range of the Scud resulted in the dramatic reduction in accuracy and payload. On January 29, Iraq attacked and occupied the lightly Marine defended Saudi city of Khafji with tanks and infantry. However, the Battle of Khafji ended when Iraqis were driven back by Saudi forces supported by US Marines with close air support over the following two days. Khafji was a strategic city immediately after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The Iraqi reluctance to commit several armoured divisions to the occupation and subsequent use of Khafji as a launching pad into the initially lightly defended Eastern portion of Saudi Arabia was a grave strategic error. Not only would Iraq have secured a majority of Middle Eastern Oil Supplies, it would have found itself better able to threaten the subsequent U.S. deployment along superior defensive lines.

The effect of the air campaign was to decimate entire Iraqi brigades deployed in the open desert in combat formation. The air campaign also prevented effective Iraqi resupply to forward deployed units engaged in combat, as well preventing the large number (450,000) of Iraqi troops from achieving the force concentration essential to victory.

The air campaign had a significant effect on the tactics employed by opposing forces in subsequent conflicts. No longer were entire divisions dug in the open facing U.S. forces but rather they were dispersed, e.g. Serbian forces in Kosovo. Opposing forces also reduced the length of their supply lines and the total area defended. This was seen during the war in Afghanistan when the Taliban preemptively abandoned large swaths of land and retreated into their strongholds. This increased their force concentration and reduced long vulnerable supply lines. This tactic was also observed in the invasion of Iraq when the Iraqi forces retreated from northern Iraqi Kurdistan into the cities.


Ground campaign

On February 22, 1991, Iraq agreed to a Soviet-proposed cease-fire agreement. The agreement called for Iraq to withdraw troops to pre-invasion positions within three weeks following a total cease-fire, and called for monitoring of the cease-fire and withdrawal to be overseen by the UN Security Council. The US rejected the proposal but said that retreating Iraqi forces would not be attacked, and gave twenty-four hours for Iraq to begin withdrawing forces.

On February 24, the U.S.-led forces began Operation Desert Storm, the ground portion of its campaign. Soon after, U.S. Marines and their Arab allies penetrated deep into Kuwait, collecting thousands of deserting Iraqi troops, weakened and demoralized by the extensive air campaign. A few days into the campaign, Kuwait City was recaptured by units of the Kuwaiti Army.

At the same time, the U.S. VII Corps launched a massive armored attack into Iraq, just to the west of Kuwait, taking the Iraqis completely by surprise. The left flank of this movement was protected by the French 6th Light Armored Division (which included units of the French Foreign Legion), and their right flank by the British 1st Armoured Division. Once the allies had penetrated deep into Iraqi territory, they turned eastward, launching a massive flank attack against the Republican Guard. Tank battles flared as the Republican Guard attempted to retreat, which the Allies won with minimal losses.
General Colin Powell briefs President George H. W. Bush and his advisors on the progress of the ground war
Enlarge
General Colin Powell briefs President George H. W. Bush and his advisors on the progress of the ground war

Once Iraq had decided it was not going to advance into the eastern oil fields of Saudi Arabia, there was no reason for Iraqi forces to deploy further south from Kuwait City in great numbers. The decision to deploy significant quantities of troops along the desert border of Kuwait unnecessarily increased the length of Iraqi supply lines. Secondly once the decision had been made to deploy along the border, the decision to extend it only slightly along the Iraqi border invited a massive flanking. Indeed the Iraqis did not possess enough forces to maintain a long enough front along the border of Kuwait and South Western Iraq. Therefore it was imperative that the deployment and the front should have been shortened to just South of Kuwait City and extending to the outskirts of Basra. Iraq possesed only one absolute military advantage over the allies being the quality and quantity of its artillery pieces. Most of Iraq's artillery pieces were towed and hence not well suited to large expansive maneuvers. This also meant that it was in Iraq's interest to slow down the movement of opposition forces and engage along lines that could not be easily broken or flanked.

The allied advance was much swifter than US generals expected. On February 26, Iraqi troops began retreating out of Kuwait, setting fire to Kuwaiti oil fields as they left. A long convoy of retreating Iraqi troops formed along the main Iraq-Kuwait highway. This convoy was bombed so extensively by the Allies that it came to be known as the Highway of Death. One hundred hours after the ground campaign started, President Bush declared a ceasefire and on February 27 declared that Kuwait had been liberated.
The "Highway of Death".

Both sides had roughly equal numbers of troops- approximately 540,000 Allied troops to approximately 545,000 Iraqi troops. A further 100,000 Turkish troops were deployed along the common border of Turkey and Iraq. This caused significant force dilution of the Iraqi military by forcing it to deploy its forces along all its borders (except ironically its bitter enemy Iran). This allowed the main thrust by the Americans to not only possess a significant technological advantage but also an equality in force numbers.


The main surprise of the ground campaign was relatively low Allied casualties. This was due to some tactical errors on the part of the Iraqis such as deploying tanks behind sand berms which offered no protection against the kinetic energy rounds used by the M1 Abrams and the other coalition tanks. Fighting from such obvious defensive positions gave away the location of the Iraqi tanks from a great distance. The Iraqi forces also failed to utilize the advantage that could be gained from using urban warfare - fighting within Kuwait City, which could have inflicted significant casualities on the attacking forces. Urban combat reduces the range at which fighting occurs and thus favours the technologically inferior force when it is defending. This has been proven most recently in the combat between U.S. forces and Iraqi partisans in urban environments after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. The confines of the urban geography would have reduced the greatest advantage of the Allies, the ability to kill at long range.


The end of hostilities

A peace conference was held in Iraqi territory occupied by the coalition. At the conference, Iraq won the approval of the use of armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border, ostensibly for government transit due to the damage done to civilian transportation. Soon after, these helicopters — and much of the Iraqi armed forces — were refocused toward fighting against a Shiite uprising in the south. In the North, Kurdish leaders took heart in American statements that they would support an uprising and began fighting, in the hopes of triggering a coup. However, when no American support was forthcoming, Iraqi generals remained loyal and brutally crushed the Kurdish troops. Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Kurdish areas of Turkey and Iran. These incidents would later result in no-fly zones being established in both the North and the South of Iraq. In Kuwait, the Emir was restored and suspected Iraqi collaborators were repressed. Eventually, over 400,000 people were expelled from the country, including a large number of Palestinians (due to their support of and collaboration with Saddam Hussein).

There was some criticism of the Bush administration for its decision to allow Saddam Hussein to remain in power, rather than pushing on to capture Baghdad and overthrowing his government. In their co-written 1998 book, A World Transformed, Bush and Brent Scowcroft arguing that such a course would have fractured the alliance and would have had many unnecessary political and human costs associated with it.

In 1992, the United States Secretary of Defense during the war, Dick Cheney, made the same point:

I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional U.S. casualties. And while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.[14]

Instead of greater involvement of its own military, the United States hoped that Saddam would be overthrown in an internal coup. The Central Intelligence Agency used its assets in Iraq to organize a revolt, but the Iraqi government defeated the effort.

On March 10, 1991, Operation Desert Farewell began to move 540,000 American troops out of the Persian Gulf.

Coalition involvement

Members of the Coalition included Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Korea, Spain, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and the United States of America. Germany and Japan provided financial assistance instead of military aid. America asked Israel not to participate in the war despite air strikes on Israeli citizens. India wasn't a part of the coalition but did extend military support to the United States in the form of refuelling facilities.




Carlos Eduardo

Podcast F1 Brasil
Avatar do usuário
VICTOR
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4238
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 5:50 pm
Localização: Curitiba

#2 Mensagem por VICTOR » Ter Jan 17, 2006 1:03 pm

:arrow: Talvez as cagadas do Bush Jr. poderiam ter sido evitadas caso Saddam tivesse sido removido naquela época.

Era a segunda vez que ele invadia um vizinho (Irã, Kuwait), e em 1991, ao contrário de 2003, havia amplo apoio na Europa e na ONU para ação contra ele.

Teria sido evitada a tragédia do massacre dos curdos ao norte e dos xiitas ao sul, com direito a gás venenoso. Sem contar o inútil embargo que só gerou pobreza, morte e miséria, sem enfraquecer o regime.

Incompreensível a decisão de liberar o Kuwait e deixar Saddam no poder.




Carlos Eduardo

Podcast F1 Brasil
Avatar do usuário
Guilherme
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 3153
Registrado em: Qua Set 03, 2003 5:06 pm
Localização: Florianópolis - Santa Catarina
Agradeceram: 58 vezes

#3 Mensagem por Guilherme » Ter Jan 17, 2006 1:20 pm

O gás venenoso foi usado após 1991 no Iraque? Pensei que a última vez foi em 1988 (Halabja).




Avatar do usuário
Guilherme
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 3153
Registrado em: Qua Set 03, 2003 5:06 pm
Localização: Florianópolis - Santa Catarina
Agradeceram: 58 vezes

#4 Mensagem por Guilherme » Ter Jan 17, 2006 1:24 pm





Avatar do usuário
VICTOR
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4238
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 5:50 pm
Localização: Curitiba

#5 Mensagem por VICTOR » Ter Jan 17, 2006 4:03 pm

Agora vc me deixou em dúvida, foi contra os curdos mas há que se conferir a época.




Carlos Eduardo

Podcast F1 Brasil
Avatar do usuário
cabeça de martelo
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 38219
Registrado em: Sex Out 21, 2005 10:45 am
Localização: Portugal
Agradeceram: 2649 vezes

USAF

#6 Mensagem por cabeça de martelo » Ter Jan 17, 2006 4:15 pm

A USAF rebentou com um depósito de contentores que tinham gás venenoso. Ao ser libertado para a atmosfera as tropas Norte-Americanas foram atingidas. Eu li isso algures na net, onde, é que eu não sei!




César
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4297
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 7:14 pm
Localização: Florianópolis
Contato:

#7 Mensagem por César » Qua Jan 18, 2006 3:24 pm

Esse foi um dos maiores massacres da história.

Não sabia que Saddam havia usado armas químicas após a Guerra do Golfo. Até onde eu saiba, ele as usou contra a vila curda de Halabja em 1988 e contra o Irã durante a Guerra Irã-Iraque.

De qualquer forma, após a guerra houve uma revolta gigantesca para derrubar o Saddam, principalmente com os Xiitas no sul e os curdos no Norte. Os americanos não acharam necessário derrubar o Saddam, não só porque sabiam que uma invasão terrestre do próprio Iraque até Bagdá(na época, com o exército bem equipado) poderia ter custos consideravelmente grandes, mas também porque esperavam que os Iraquianos derrubassem-no.

Deu tudo errado, o Saddam matou milhares de pessoas e continuou no poder.

Abraços

César




"- Tú julgarás a ti mesmo- respondeu-lhe o rei - É o mais difícil. É bem mais difícil julgar a si mesmo que julgar os outros. Se consegues fazer um bom julgamento de ti, és um verdadeiro sábio."

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
César
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 4297
Registrado em: Qua Fev 19, 2003 7:14 pm
Localização: Florianópolis
Contato:

#8 Mensagem por César » Qua Jan 18, 2006 3:25 pm

Agora uma curiosidade: Vocês acham que, em 1991, existia algum país no mundo que, isoladamente, conseguiria resistir a uma operação aérea como a Desert Storm sem ter todo o seu IADS destruído?

Abraços

César




"- Tú julgarás a ti mesmo- respondeu-lhe o rei - É o mais difícil. É bem mais difícil julgar a si mesmo que julgar os outros. Se consegues fazer um bom julgamento de ti, és um verdadeiro sábio."

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
Avatar do usuário
Einsamkeit
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9042
Registrado em: Seg Mai 02, 2005 10:02 pm
Localização: Eu sou do Sul, é so olhar pra ver que eu sou do Sul, A minha terra tem um cel azul, é so olhar e ver

#9 Mensagem por Einsamkeit » Qua Jan 18, 2006 3:27 pm

César escreveu:Agora uma curiosidade: Vocês acham que, em 1991, existia algum país no mundo que, isoladamente, conseguiria resistir a uma operação aérea como a Desert Storm sem ter todo o seu IADS destruído?

Abraços

César


Em 1991 nao, mais se fosse um pouco antes sim......... 1985 digamos...




Somos memórias de lobos que rasgam a pele
Lobos que foram homens e o tornarão a ser
ou talvez memórias de homens.
que insistem em não rasgar a pele
Homens que procuram ser lobos
mas que jamais o tornarão a ser...
Moonspell - Full Moon Madness

Imagem
Avatar do usuário
talharim
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9831
Registrado em: Sex Mai 07, 2004 11:40 pm
Localização: Santos-SP
Agradeceram: 212 vezes

#10 Mensagem por talharim » Qua Jan 18, 2006 3:34 pm

Agora uma curiosidade: Vocês acham que, em 1991, existia algum país no mundo que, isoladamente, conseguiria resistir a uma operação aérea como a Desert Storm sem ter todo o seu IADS destruído?


Sim.

Japão
Suécia
Rússia
Israel
Inglaterra




Avatar do usuário
Einsamkeit
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 9042
Registrado em: Seg Mai 02, 2005 10:02 pm
Localização: Eu sou do Sul, é so olhar pra ver que eu sou do Sul, A minha terra tem um cel azul, é so olhar e ver

#11 Mensagem por Einsamkeit » Qua Jan 18, 2006 3:36 pm

Mais todos sao aliados dos americanos, Só a russia mesmo seria alvo e suportaria o ataque




Somos memórias de lobos que rasgam a pele
Lobos que foram homens e o tornarão a ser
ou talvez memórias de homens.
que insistem em não rasgar a pele
Homens que procuram ser lobos
mas que jamais o tornarão a ser...
Moonspell - Full Moon Madness

Imagem
Avatar do usuário
Patton
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 1108
Registrado em: Sáb Ago 27, 2005 8:25 pm
Localização: Estados Unidos

#12 Mensagem por Patton » Qua Jan 18, 2006 4:44 pm

Entao, este e' a razao pela segunda guerra contra o Saddam. Isso e' um dos examplos do que acontece quando os politicos nao deixam as Forcas Armadas de terminar com a obra. Significa que o problema nunca vai ser resolvida ate algem depois um tempo chega, nesse causa, G. W. Bush Jr. Um outro examplo e' a guerra no Korea.




Imagem
Imagem

"Agora eu quero que vocês se lembrem que nenhum filho de *** ganhou uma guerra morrendo de pena dele. Ela ganhou ao forçar o outro filho da *** a morrer pelo seu país"~
Avatar do usuário
Guerra
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 14202
Registrado em: Dom Abr 27, 2003 10:47 pm
Agradeceram: 135 vezes

#13 Mensagem por Guerra » Qua Jan 18, 2006 5:01 pm

César escreveu:
Deu tudo errado, o Saddam matou milhares de pessoas e continuou no poder.

Abraços

César


Mas de certa forma ele se enfraqueceu muito, tanto no campo militar como politico e golpe final ficou mais facil.




A HONESTIDADE É UM PRESENTE MUITO CARO, NÃO ESPERE ISSO DE PESSOAS BARATAS!
Avatar do usuário
Clermont
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 8842
Registrado em: Sáb Abr 26, 2003 11:16 pm
Agradeceram: 644 vezes

#14 Mensagem por Clermont » Qua Jan 18, 2006 8:41 pm

Entao, este e' a razao pela segunda guerra contra o Saddam. Isso e' um dos examplos do que acontece quando os politicos nao deixam as Forcas Armadas de terminar com a obra.


Estaria certo se não fosse por um detalhe beeeem pequenininho.

Foram os próprios generais americanos que instaram o Presidente Bush, O Velho, a interromper a guerra.

Os objetivos militares e políticos já haviam sido alcançados (o Kuwait estava libertado e o Exército iraquiano, dizimado). Continuar o avanço significaria ultrapassar a resolução da ONU que exigia tão somente, a libertação do país ocupado. E, por conseguinte, dissolveria a coalizão, pois os aliados árabes não queriam a derrocada de um regime árabe sunita que era um dissuasor da ameaça persa xiita.




Avatar do usuário
Rui Elias Maltez
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 13951
Registrado em: Ter Nov 16, 2004 1:38 pm
Localização: Sintra, Portugal
Agradeceram: 1 vez
Contato:

#15 Mensagem por Rui Elias Maltez » Qui Jan 26, 2006 12:50 pm

Não tenho informação de que Saddam tenha utilizado armas químicas após 1991.

Ele reprimiu sim, e violentamente uma revolta xiita no sul, mais particularmente em Bassora.

Os Xiitas pensando que se se revoltassem contra o regime de Saddam, (mantido e apoiados pelos sunitas) poderiam ter a sua autonomia, se apoiados pelos americanos.

Um pouco o que aconteceria aos curdos no norte.

Mas os aliados deixaram os xiitas abandonados à sua sorte, e parece que a repressão de Saddam foi cruel.

Mas o estabelecimento das célebres zonas de exclusão aérea a norte e a sul acabaram por dificultar a aviação iraquiana e os céus iraquianos passaram durante 12 anos a ser esquadrinhados frequentemente por aviões americanos e ingleses.

Imagem

Ainda em 1998 houve um ataque e bombardeamentos após Saddam ter expulso um grupo de monitores da ONU.

E ataques pontuais a radares e baterias anti-aéreas decorreram durante 12 anos, a par das sanções internacionais.

Por isso, e dada a extrema vigilância do seu espaço, acho iverossímil que os aliados, e nomeadamente americanos e ingleses não soubesse que de facto Saddam não tinha a mínima hipótese em 2003 de ter armas químicas ou outras.




Imagem
Responder