CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

Assuntos em discussão: Força Aérea Brasileira, forças aéreas estrangeiras e aviação militar.

Moderadores: Glauber Prestes, Conselho de Moderação

Mensagem
Autor
Avatar do usuário
Viktor Reznov
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 6821
Registrado em: Sex Jan 15, 2010 2:02 pm
Agradeceu: 1959 vezes
Agradeceram: 791 vezes

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#16 Mensagem por Viktor Reznov » Sáb Abr 18, 2020 2:01 pm

Não achei um tópico específico pra video então vai aqui mesmo





I know the weakness, I know the pain. I know the fear you do not name. And the one who comes to find me when my time is through. I know you, yeah I know you.
Avatar do usuário
Frederico Vitor
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 2063
Registrado em: Ter Ago 14, 2007 1:34 pm
Localização: Goiás
Agradeceu: 206 vezes
Agradeceram: 270 vezes

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#17 Mensagem por Frederico Vitor » Dom Abr 19, 2020 1:23 pm

Viper variants: Unusual F-16s

The F-16, the best designed fighter jet of the 20th century, has proved an excellent aircraft to modify, build upon and generally mess around with. Here are some of the unlikely Vipers that have flown over the last forty years, we have also cheated to include some unofficial clones that cheekily borrowed a little F-16 DNA.

Diverterless supersonic inlet ‘Bump Rider’ (1996)

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/hhh-2.png?w=1024

Jet engines cannot handle supersonic airflow, which considering fighters go at twice the speed of sound is a problem. So the airflow is slowed down before it enters the engine. There are various ways to do this and they are heavy, require maintenance and tend to be highly visible to enemy radars. The diverterless supersonic inlet, however, is an elegant and clever solution.

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/iii.png?w=1024

It is simply a bump that slows down the airflow, while also blocking enemy radar’s view of the engine compressor face (a highly reflective surface). It was used on the F-35 Lightning with and achieved a 30% weight saving over the traditional solution. I’m not (necessarily) saying that Chinese designers stole the idea, but have a look at the Chengdu J-10B/C, CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder, Chengdu J-20, Shenyang FC-31 and Guizhou JL-9.

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/ggg.png?w=1024

General Dynamics F-16XL ‘Hyper Viper’

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/308637main_ec97-44354-3_full.jpg?w=1024

The leading edge of Concorde’s wing reduces in sweep as it runs from the fuselage to the wingtip. The reason being that a traditional delta wing, like that of the Mirage III has pretty ropey low-speed handling qualities. The XL began life as an effort to see if technologies from supersonic transport, such as the cranked delta, could benefit military aircraft. The first of two F-16XLs flew in 1982 and the results were dramatic: there was a 25% improvement in maximum lift-to-drag ratio in supersonic flight and an 11% while in subsonic flight. Compared to a regular F-16 the ride was smoother at high speeds and- somewhat surprisingly – at low altitudes. The baseline F-16 was already the longest-legged fighter in USAF, but the fuel was could now be increased by a hefty 82%. The F-16XL could carry twice the ordnance weight of the F-16 and deliver it 40% further.

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/f-16_and_f-16xl_aerial_top_down_view.jpg?w=1024

Before the XL had flown, USAF had launched the Enhanced Tactical Fighter to replace the F-111. USAF essentially wanted a fighter-bomber capable of deep air interdiction missions without fighter or jammer support. Something based on the F-16XL could clearly be a strong contender and so General Dynamics entered the fray, eventually losing out to the F-15E. The XL lost, as unlike the F-15E it varied a great deal from the aircraft it was based on and would likely have incurred greater development costs. The larger more powerful twin-engined aircraft was also seen as more survivable and future-proof.

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/screenshot-2020-01-19-at-17.02.11.png?w=1024

The aircraft then went to work for NASA, exploring the use of holed laminar flow wings. The intention was to explore whether these laser-cut holes could suck turbulent airflow over the wing, restoring laminar flow. Around this time the second XL, which was a two-seater, was re-engined with the monstrous -229. With this new engine it accidentally achieved supercruise (reaching and sustaining supersonic speed without recourse to afterburner) getting to Mach 1.1. After various research for NASA in support supersonic transport research, including sonic boom characteristics and engine noise, the XLs ceased flying in 1999.

Lockheed F-16U ‘The Delta Belter’ (1991)

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/1kacwxp2fpn31.jpg?w=588&zoom=2

In the early 90s the United Arab Emirates was after a fighter with a long range and a large weapon load, capable of mounting attacks deep into Iran. General Dynamics, which had just been absorbed into Lockheed, came up with a strong concept – a delta F-16. A cranked ‘arrowhead’ delta wing had been tested on the F-16 already and had boosted fuel capacity by up to 82%. GD’s new delta F-16 would use a cropped wing design it had developed for the ATF effort that led to the F-22. The UAE was willing to pay for development on the condition that USAF purchased a wing’s worth of F-16Us. This was an offer USAF could not agree to as devotion to JSF (later F-35) was sacrosanct and the lower risk F-16U threatened to steal funding, and possibly the security of the whole JSF effort . Others were afraid of the F-16U too. Aerospace reporter Bill Sweetman noted that prominent members of the Eurofighter consortium believed the aircraft would have ‘killed’ the Typhoon. If it had been built it is likely the F-16U would have been an extremely capable aircraft that would have dented the eurocanard’s global sales severely.

Hawker Siddeley P.1200 ‘Kingston Rudeboy’

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/12240092_637521206386189_3002719653970606436_n-1.jpg?w=549&zoom=2

In the mid 1970s, the British company Hawker Siddeley developed a concept for a medium-weight fighter for the Royal Air Force strongly influenced by the US’ F-16. This series of ‘P.1200’ concepts came from the company’s Kingston division. Though considerably larger than the F-16, most of the P.1200 designs featured a similar air intake, canopy, leading edge root extensions and general wing configuration.

Strangely the P.1202 design was offered with either two RB.199s or a single RB.431. The RB.199 was then in development for the Tornado, but as experience would show with the ADV, it was not a suitable fighter engine; it was tailor-made for the low-level regime and was a poor performer at the medium and high altitudes that an air superiority fighter needs to operate in. The RB.431 study was essentially a Pegasus with reheat and no vectored thrust nozzles, though powerful it again seems an odd choice for a supersonic fighter.

The initial design, from November 1975, featured a canard layout with square shoulder-mounted intakes, similar to the later Saab Gripen. Further designs utilised a conventional tail and dorsal intakes. Internal armament for the early P.1200 designs was two 27-mm Mauser cannon. Air-to-air armament was expected to be AIM-9 Sidewinders and SkyFlash medium-range missiles. In the secondary air-to-ground role it could have carried four bombs in a low-drag recess.

By 1977 the aircraft had become even more strongly influenced by the F-16. Both single and twin vertical fin configurations were tested. The twin-tailed P.1202 pictured above, would have had superior high alpha performance to the F-16, and given a suitable engine, would have made a formidable dogfighter.

Mitsubishi F-2 ‘Mamushi moshi’ (1995)

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/87808_1511105289.jpg?w=830&h=515&zoom=2

If Japan’s desire to keep its aerospace industrial base alive is an expensive vanity project, then a prime example is the F-2. It’s a pretty average F-16 in capability, yet costing around four times per unit! Still, with its fantastic paintjob the F-2 is the most attractive member of the Viper family. The US negotiated an exceptionally aggressive technology transfer agreement whereby the US benefits from any unique tech that Japan develops for the F-2. The F-2 has a larger wing than the F-16, more composites in the structure and a stronger (more conventionally braced) canopy. The wing, and indeed the F-2 itself, was based on the Agile Falcon, a proposed low cost complement to the ATF programme that led to the F-22.

Unusual F-4 Phantom IIs here

Whereas the Mitsubishi F-1 was essentially an unlicensed pirate copy of the Jaguar (an aircraft JASDF had assessed in detail), Mitsubishi did not dare the same approach with the US. One of the most expensive aircraft in the world, it is at least a real looker. It could also be argued that the F-2 kept the Japanese aerospace industry technologically relevant – something vital to Japan’s ambitious new fighter, the nascent F-3.

Lockheed Martin built 40% of the F-2. Comapred to a baseline F-16C, the F-2 has a larger nose, more internal fuel, greater wingspan and wing area, with two more hardpoints. It may be the only F-16 with 13 hardpoints, making an eight air-to-air missile load-out conceivable. It would appear to have the largest radar array of any F-16 variant — and Japan has recently upgraded their AESA.

Vought/General Dynamics 1600 series ‘Sea Viper’ (1973)

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/ltv-v-1600-concept-art.jpg

The F-16 won the USAF Light Weight Fighter contest in the early 1970s, so it made sense – in terms of commonality and economy of scale – to suggest a version for the Navy. The Navy wanted a replacement for the F-4 and A-7 that was smaller and cheaper than the F-14 Tomcat. Having no carrier aircraft experience, General Dynamics teamed up with Vought to offer the 1600.

It would have differed from the early F-16 in several ways, including a beefier undercarriage and the ability to use AIM-7 Sparrow missiles. The Navy decided against it in 1975, preferring the twin-engined F/A-18 (based on the Northrop F-18L) offered by McDonnell Douglas.

https://hushkit.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/vought_model_1602-1.jpg

Imagem

:arrow: https://hushkit.net/2020/01/19/viper-va ... ual-f-16s/




Avatar do usuário
Túlio
Site Admin
Site Admin
Mensagens: 61388
Registrado em: Sáb Jul 02, 2005 9:23 pm
Localização: Tramandaí, RS, Brasil
Agradeceu: 6260 vezes
Agradeceram: 6610 vezes
Contato:

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#18 Mensagem por Túlio » Dom Mai 23, 2021 6:29 pm

PÁRA TUDO!!! [026]

Não tem pro Top Gun (1 e 2) nem pros Chevaliers du Ciel, quem SABE MESMO fazer filme com combate aéreo é O PAQUISTÃO! Caí duro quando vi cenas deste filme:





Vejam só o que os caras sabem fazer:


DOGFIGHT 1: Sabre vs Hunter




DOGFIGHT 2: JF-17 vs Mirage 2000.




CARACA, os caras são craques em animação e efeitos, além de a história parecer ser das buenas. Quem souber de algum serviço de Streaming que esteja exibindo é favor informar, tem cenas de deixar a gente de queixo caído... :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:




“Look at these people. Wandering around with absolutely no idea what's about to happen.”

P. Sullivan (Margin Call, 2011)
Avatar do usuário
FCarvalho
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 37793
Registrado em: Sex Mai 02, 2003 6:55 pm
Localização: Manaus
Agradeceu: 5637 vezes
Agradeceram: 3246 vezes

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#19 Mensagem por FCarvalho » Dom Mai 23, 2021 8:04 pm

Eu já tinha visto algo assim no you tube em algum lugar. Mas não me lembro se era o filme todo.
Os indianos também tem as suas produções no estilo.
Imagino que muitas das cenas são baseadas em relatos reais de pilotos de ambos os lados.
Tirando o fato que só tem dog fight bacana, seria uma merda ver filme com combate BVR, todo o resto dos filmes é bem legalzinho de se ver. Pelo menos as cenas de ação.




Carpe Diem
Avatar do usuário
gogogas
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 2176
Registrado em: Dom Jun 14, 2009 5:48 pm
Agradeceu: 52 vezes
Agradeceram: 222 vezes

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#20 Mensagem por gogogas » Dom Mai 23, 2021 9:45 pm

Vi estes trailers , qndo procurei por filme , ainda estava pra lançar , no site que pesquisei , ele poderia ir para a Amazon ou YouTube pra alugar




Gogogas !
Avatar do usuário
Túlio
Site Admin
Site Admin
Mensagens: 61388
Registrado em: Sáb Jul 02, 2005 9:23 pm
Localização: Tramandaí, RS, Brasil
Agradeceu: 6260 vezes
Agradeceram: 6610 vezes
Contato:

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#21 Mensagem por Túlio » Sex Jul 02, 2021 4:22 pm

Pensa num pouso RADICAL!!! :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:






“Look at these people. Wandering around with absolutely no idea what's about to happen.”

P. Sullivan (Margin Call, 2011)
Avatar do usuário
FCarvalho
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 37793
Registrado em: Sex Mai 02, 2003 6:55 pm
Localização: Manaus
Agradeceu: 5637 vezes
Agradeceram: 3246 vezes

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#22 Mensagem por FCarvalho » Sáb Jul 03, 2021 10:30 am

A pista de Surucucu é considerada uma das mais perigosa, senão a mais, em termos de pouso de aeronaves. Há outras nos PEF tão ruins quanto ela, mas essa daí ganhou o prêmio de pista ruim de operação.




Carpe Diem
Avatar do usuário
jambockrs
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 2617
Registrado em: Sex Jun 10, 2005 1:45 am
Localização: Porto Alegre/RS
Agradeceu: 427 vezes
Agradeceram: 180 vezes

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#23 Mensagem por jambockrs » Ter Out 25, 2022 5:16 pm

Meus prezados
Eis o início das atividade de resgate aéreo na USAF.
http://desastresaereosnews.blogspot.com ... ns-do.html
Mas, antecedendo estas atividade na USAF, uma médica francesa em um heli H-13, executou tal operação na Guerra da Indochina.




Um abraço e até mais...
Cláudio Severino da Silva
claudioseverinodasilva41@gmail.com
Avatar do usuário
jambockrs
Sênior
Sênior
Mensagens: 2617
Registrado em: Sex Jun 10, 2005 1:45 am
Localização: Porto Alegre/RS
Agradeceu: 427 vezes
Agradeceram: 180 vezes

Re: CURIOSIDADES E NOTÍCIAS EXÓTICAS

#24 Mensagem por jambockrs » Sáb Nov 12, 2022 1:20 pm

Crawl through a 75-year-old bomber B-24 Liberator
https://fighterjetsworld.com/air/fighte ... ght/10796/
Comenta-se que o B-24 era estruturalmente inferior ao B-17 Flying Fortress ao suportar a AA alemã.




Um abraço e até mais...
Cláudio Severino da Silva
claudioseverinodasilva41@gmail.com
Responder